This is a long report as all these reports are, and typical
of bureauspeak we have on the one hand this
and on the other that, so continue
with the present system. Therefore the writers cannot be blamed for anything in
the report.
Chapter 4 covers “Religious diversity: questions about Islam”
It starts with the Scanlon Foundation Survey which is
interesting:
- 91% of respondents believe in maintaining the Australian way of life
- 12% of migrants report of some form of discrimination in 2012, but nearly three times 31% of Muslims report some discrimination.
- Asylum issues now rank third in importance to respondents after the economy and government. In 2011 7%said asylum issues were their main concern, in 2012 this is now 12%
- 23% had strong negative feelings to people from Iraq and Lebanon
- 25% of respondents were negative to the Muslim faith
- 40% of respondents have very or somewhat negative feelings towards Muslims. This feeling was particularly strong with older people>65yrs, lower education standards, people in financial trouble, residents of Queensland and WA, those outside capital cities and third generation Australians.
Overall Australians are at ease with religious diversity but
one in four are uncomfortable with Islam.
Of the 513 submissions received for the whole report, 212
raised concerns or discussed Islam in Australia. 80% of these 212 submissions
plus 30 others, maintained that Australia is a Christian country, and should
not accommodate other value systems. Respondents believed that Multiculturalism
in advocating respect for cultural and religious diversity, supports ethnic
separation.
AFIC the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils,
submitted that Islamic law is changeable,( i.e. not locked in), according to
the requirements of different places and times, and therefore suits the values
shared by Australian people.
My comment to this
is that AFIC is lying and being devious,
look what has happened in Europe. The Koran the word of God and the Hadith, cannot be changed.
The question of Halal certification was not central to the
enquiry, but may warrant further investigation.
The report received submissions that Islamic immigration in Europe
and Australia are different, and should not be compared. My realiastic view is grow up, Islam is Islam. However, the
Tasmanian government urged caution, and that practical policies should support
full social and economic participation.
There were several recommendations to continue with
interfaith dialogue and support programmes but also to explain that the
benefits of cultural diversity be matched with respect for Australian law and
values. Some respondents submitted that it was marginalisation from mainstream
Australia that raised the threat of terrorism not multiculturalism.
The conclusions:
Multiculturalism is an indisputable success story for
Australia.
The Galbally report April 1978 “the view of post arrival
programmes and services to migration” reports the vision, that multiculturalism
respects diversity and fosters engagement with Australian values, identity and
citizenship. Within the framework of Australian laws. My view is that this vision is irrelevant now that we have Muslim
rather than Christian immigrants.
There is mention of a
policy of social inclusion, rights, responsibilities, and obligations. However
the report overall gives Government the option to do absolutely nothing to
allay the concerns of 25% of the population, and continue with a policy of
appeasement.
No comments:
Post a Comment