Banks seem to think so
Are banks
our new moral guardians? Many people have the opposite view, that they are
morally corrupt. However two recent cases indicate that they are acting as some
sort of moral or political controllers.
Earlier this
year, Geert Wilders a democratically elected member of the Parliament of the
Netherlands, and currently leader of the largest parliamentary party in the
government of the Netherlands, visited Australia. He was invited to Australia
to talk on Islam in Europe, and the European lesson for Australia.
Now many
people disagree with his views, and many agree with his views, as is their
respective rights. The Federal government granted him a visa to visit
Australia.
Q Society
the inviting body tried to open a merchant facility with Westpac Bank, in order
for tickets for his talk to be sold. The bank refused to open a facility, stating
that it was inappropriate.
The other day
in Sydney, a fledgling right wing political party the “Party for Freedom” tried
to open a merchant facility with the Commonwealth and Westpac banks. Their request was refused, one reason
given by the Commonwealth bank was ‘The
type of business operation’. But ‘The party for Freedom’ is a political
party, which was launched early this year, and is trying to get established.
Again many will disagree with its policies, and many will agree with its
policies, but it is a legal entity. I do not agree with some of the policies of
the Labor and Liberal parties, but I do not propose that they cannot have a
bank account. This is a democratic country.
So why then
are the banks trying to determine what views are right and what views are
wrong? If the body applying for a facility is illegal or banned, then they
should refuse, but the two parties mentioned here are not illegal or banned, quite
the contrary.
It is not
the role of the banks to interfere with
democracy and the freedom of expression, nor should they attempt to influence
what is ‘politically correct’ and what is not. They, of all people should not
try to act as our moral guardians.
It's a disgrace as well as a double standard for what is seen many as a greedy and immoral type of institution to place it's self above the anti discrimination act and pontificate on what is or is not moral and righteous.
ReplyDeleteSad day for Australia and democracy.